Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Forex is a fraud

SO you are an experienced trader or you are just going to start the winning cycle.

There is one thing that you should know from the start.

FOREX IS A FRAUD.

Yes, only brokers win. Entities who created the money system in the first place created Forex.

In many aspects forex is like the ordinary life - the strong eats the weak. You think that cannibalism is an act of the past? Think again. We are in the middle of it.

Modern money (and most ancient money too) is essentially a token — in other words, an abstraction.

So, forex is a tool for trading an abstraction.

Who controls the money?

Let's look into the past.

The great variety of coinages originally in use in the Hellenic world meant that money changing was the earliest and most common form of Greek banking. Usually the money changers would carry out their business in or around temples and other public buildings, setting up their trapezium-shaped tables (which usually carried a series of lines and squares for assisting calculations), from which the Greek bankers, the trapezitai derived their name, much as our name for bank comes from the Italian banca for bench or counter. The close association between banking, money changing and temples is best known to us from the episode of Christ's overturning the tables in the Temple of Jerusalem (Matthew 21.12).


http://www.projects.ex.ac.uk/RDavies/arian/origins.html#exchange

Who is the diety of the money?

In Rome it was Juno.

One of the words for money in the Hebrew language is mammon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mammon



LIMINALITY.

Liminal phenomena are typically transient, ephemeral, and have an affinity for chaos, transition, and instability. They are also usually viewed as slightly disreputable. Ghosts themselves are transient; their manifestations are unpredictable. They are neither solid nor stable. The question of their reality is perennially in dispute.

http://www.tricksterbook.com/ArticlesOnline/GhostsAndLiminality.html

Can you see some similarities? I definitely can.

So, what is Forex?

It is an illussion - a staged magic - made to distract your attention. You use a BROKER, you use a SOFTWARE. Your attention is focused on many things they setup to give you an impression of understanding. Various sources tell that markets are chaotic in nature. You are reading news, looking at technical indicators - all this is given to you to give you an impression of understanding things.

But where does the quotes come from?

Banks? Brokers?

Where does the news come from?

Governments?

What are you looking to on the screen?

THE SOFTWARE?

Does not look like chaos to me.

A thought crossed my mind - that brokers can form the CARTEL. The target of the CARTEL is to get your money. Not like they really need it - because possibly they have set up the money system in the first place. Their target is you and your personal wealth.

What is the CARTEL? - I don't really know at the moment.

Can it exist? Definitely. And I base my assumption on logic and facts - secret societies existed for a very long time and money served ritual and controlling purpose.

Forex uses one of the most powerful lusts of all - the lust for money. In modern world in many cases it outweights sex, food, drugs and even instinct for survival.

There is a bold difference between virtual trading and real trading.

Many people found that with real money accounts market seems to behave differently.

I have an idea that BROKER might exploit the quantum nature of worlds. Its technology is by definition far more advanced then yours. So, it might use a many-worlds scenario to put you into controllable bubble.

The many-worlds interpretation or MWI (also known as relative state formulation, theory of the universal wavefunction, parallel universes, many-universes interpretation or many worlds), is an interpretation of quantum mechanics. Many-worlds denies the objective reality of wavefunction collapse. Many-worlds then explains the subjective appearance of wavefunction collapse with the mechanism of quantum decoherence. Consequently, many-worlds claims this resolves all the "paradoxes" of quantum theory since every possible outcome to every event defines or exists in its own "history" or "world". In layman's terms, this means that there are an infinite number of universes and that everything that could possibly happen in our universe (but doesn't) does happen in another.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation


Some of the points stressed by Glyn Davies in his book are:

* Money did not have a single origin but developed independently in many different parts of the world.

* Many factors contributed to its development and if evidence of what anthropologists have learned about primitive money is anything to go by economic factors were not the most important.

* Money performs a variety of functions and the functions performed by the earliest types were probably fairly restricted initially and would NOT necessarily have been the same in all societies.

* Money is fungible: there is a tendency for older forms to take on new roles and for new forms to be developed which take on old roles, e.g. on English banknotes such as the 5 pound notes it says "I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of five pounds" and below that it carries the signature of the chief cashier of the Bank of England. This is a reminder that originally banknotes were regarded in Britain, and in many other countries, as a substitute for money and only later did they come to be accepted as the real thing.


"...magicians, if they are strictly ethical, are morally under obligation to insist that their methods are purely natural" (Fitzkee, 1944).



Magick.

Definition from the Wikipedia:

Magick, in the broadest sense, is any act designed to cause intentional change. To change nothing into something and something into something else.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

hello !
i appreciate your opinion...
its is a cartel !

i had money in funds safely in a bank, and a take off R$ 200 ($100) to invest in forex...
first i tried in demo... i had good results ! but in real broker..
i make too many operations in 2 days, researchin a good price to value mine money and win some money...
now i have $26 dollars in real broker... -74% !! all stop loose

mine Expert Advisor's failed...
mine analyses are failed...

WHY THE BROKERs DONT NEED COST IN OPERATION ??
if a make a position, mine broker wins becase the spread...
if a buy a position, i start with -6pips (example)...
i'm a small investor... mine stop lose is 10pips... one moment of 6pips + 10stop lose: 16pips... i have no margin to make good deals..
few or no one chances of win...

we need lot of know about this market, how its works...
make a war, dont make us be rich !
im in forex to make rich !!
i have $ 26 only, 22yrs old, too many things to learn, and i want a miracle to find the promise of highs money with a ilusion of forex...

dont desire, dont be afraid bro
i dont will
one time, will be mine time of take his money

sorry for mine english, hug from Brazil !
Daniel S.
(nick DANS in fxstreet live chat)

sol said...

They main target was reached - your wealth and emotions are taken. Don't let the losses put you down.
This is a magickal challenge. Take it or leave it.

I'll do my best to confront those forces.